VA: Win in Virginia as 4th Circuit reverses and remands ex-post-facto registration case.
Some good news (or, I should say partial good news because a dismissal was upheld on due process grounds), out of Virginia where an Ex-Post-Facto case was reversed and remanded after being dismissed by the trial court.
In 1994, Prynne was convicted and sentenced to probation for having sex with a 15-year old for which she served as the family nanny. The following year the Virginia registry was enacted, a few years later the length of time one had to register for was extended and over the course of 25 years since, the finish line kept moving for Ms. Prynne.
The court used the expression from the 6th Circuit, that Smith v. Doe should not be seen as a blank check for states to enact harsher and harsher registration requirements and that the Plaintiffs complaint alleged sufficient arguments to proceed and she should have her day in court.
The opinion can be read here: Prynne v Settle – 4th Cir
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“The lifetime
requirement that she register as a sex offender, she argues, is “irrational” because the
registry does not actually achieve its purpose of preventing recidivism and because Prynne,
in particular, is “not a recidivism risk.” Appellant’s Br. 42–43. However, the Court is
compelled “to accept a legislature’s generalizations” and finds the State’s contention that
VSOR protects the public by reducing sex offenses a “conceivable basis” for the law.
Heller, 409 U.S. at 321; see also Smith, 538 U.S. at 102–03 (finding Alaska sex offender
registry served a legitimate purpose “by alerting the public to the risk of sex offenders in
their communit[y]” (alteration in original)); Under Seal, 709 F.3d at 265. Indeed, in the
eyes of the legislators who enacted VSOR, that Prynne has lived “a model life” since her
conviction, supports the conclusion that the registry helps prevent recidivism.”
So the legislators opinions trump empirical evidence in a court of law.
What does any of this mean for florida? Sorry if I sound petty or anything but all I see is other states getting some type of relief but not florida I thought this was supposed to be about Floridians on the registry.All I ever see is other states.Im sorry but I’m just over all of this
This has to do with Virginia, not Florida.
We post news and information from across the world.
For Florida’s Federal circuit, its persuasive authority, amirite?
The rabbit is out of the hat. When other circuits join in on that 6th Circuit home run of Does vs Snyder the winds of change have arrived.
Prynne is a fine example of what’s going on. Her and hundreds of thousands shouldn’t be on any registry. Period.
I spent 29 years serving my country and I do not intend to rest until my voting rights are restored. Had I stayed in Virginia I could now vote but I came to Florida to help out my parents. Other than some of Florida’s antiquated laws I like living here and have made many new friends.
Problem here in Florida is 25 years starts upon release! That’s messed up as my reg started long before that. Florida has been adding punishment for decades with no reversals.
JEV – True Confessions