VIDEO: House Infrastructure Strategies Committee HB 1085
Meeting on April 17, 2023
Watch here or on YouTube.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
22 thoughts on “VIDEO: House Infrastructure Strategies Committee HB 1085”
Comment Policy
- PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
- Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
- Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
- *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
- Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
- Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
- *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
- Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
- Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information
https://news.yahoo.com/pensacola-sex-offender-gets-3-161703861.html
If I’m not mistaken he completely cited the issues with Alabama and Louisianas laws wrongly
He was totally misinformed, he knew nothing of what he spoke. Example: the license is in Blue not black, it is clearly written out, there is no numbers.This is why these PUNISHMENTS are so easily passed, uninformed people that only look at the crime and thrive on unlawful penalties. Any punishment doled out to a convicted person beyond the order of the court is a violation of the law. The 8th Amendment:, the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. There are presently 52 punitive requirements for a sex offender/predator. I also believe the state has a responsibility for the S.O. offenders for his/her safety, since the supply ALL INFORMATION NECESSARY to someone that wishes harm/death on offenders. I think that’s aiding and abetting. It’s like someone supplying the gun to a school shooter. Thank your attention to this matter!
Quite correct tony, not to mention the clause in the law “ equal protection of law”. But yet they dismiss it when any crimes are committed twords one of us . rc’s have had there houses vandalized , they have been threatened and assaulted scammed and even murdered and what does the law do ? Nothing….. well not nothing they all but applaud the murderer
Not to mention the ones who have been convicted based on a accusation by a ex out for vengeance or custody
I’m confused did it pass? And if so how with him hot knowing a single answer and with actual good questions. If it passes for one type of criminal then ot needs to happen to all. As you can’t single out 1 group
Yes, it did pass, but this issue is far from being a done deal.
We had 3 Reps, speaking the true and showing great concerns and giving good reasons. I would love to see one of them talking about the issue that not all sex offenders have victims, not all sex offender has inflicted damaged to a minor and those are also under the same umbrella. All in all it was good debate about the red lettering and I think this bill will not pass as it is now.
Interesting , he couldn’t answer about half the questions and said he would check on it and the other half that he attempted to answer but really only pussyfooted around the answer and didn’t answer them. Then he expected everyone to vote on it when they were in the dark as to its ramifications.
Also obviously made into a political issue observable by the vote all republicans for all democrats except one against.
Is this what it’s all about?
Also what kind of hearing is this when because he can’t answer questions decides ,” ok no more questions or comments “ ?. Who does he think they are news reporters?