The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has ruled that completely restricting a person’s access to the internet as a condition of their parole from prison is a violation of the First Amendment.

Here is the decision: http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/spring2018/16-1156.pdf

“Like the statute in Packingham, Mr. Ross’s condition of parole ‘bars access to…sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge,’” the decision states.

Unlike the statute in Packingham, Ross’s condition of parole extends beyond social media and forbids him from visiting any website, receiving an email from an employer or medical professional, paying a bill online, using the internet to check the weather or using a smartphone.

“Because Mr. Ross’s condition of parole is broader than the statute struck down in Packingham, we find that it is an overbroad restriction of free speech in violation of the First Amendment,” Ketchum wrote.

SOURCE

Share This

Let's Spread Truth

Share this post!