News & Updates

Although it wasn’t an article about sex offenders per-se, FAC President Gail Colletta contributed a quote to a Naples Daily News article about housing for ex-felons. “‘Sorry, we don’t rent to felons’ — we get that excuse all the time,” said Colletta, who now heads a Lake Monroe, Florida-based advocacy group for sex offenders called the Florida Action Committee. But

TALLAHASSEE, FL (WTXL) — The group behind the sex offender rehabilitation program at Good Samaritan Network on Woodville Highway is speaking out about the program. Andy Messer, the Administrator for the Good Samaritan Network says that they currently have 16 people living at the Woodville Highway facility. Messer says that Good Samaritan Network has been operating since 2007 and in

As mentioned in a prior post; the ACLU filed it’s Appellate Brief on behalf of FAC and the 200+ registered citizens living alongside the railroad tracks at the corner of 79th Street and NW 36th Avenue in Miami. Derek Logue of OnceFallen.com, who had traveled to Florida last week and visited the encampment initiated a post to which FAC replied.

You gotta love attorney Patrick Leduc! The former military JAG attorney will not allow himself to be intimidated or pushed around and will certainly not allow his clients to be either. When he forwarded us an FYI copy of his pleading yesterday, the first thought that came to mind was, “hell yeah!!!” As registered citizens (or family of registered citizens)

As our organization grows, the Board of Directors felt it became prudent and necessary to adopt a Member Code of Conduct which was approved during yesterday’s Board of Director’s meeting.   FAC has put forth this Code of Conduct as a set of guiding principles that acts as a framework for the behavior of our Members. It requires that our

The ACLU has filed it’s appellate brief on behalf of Florida Action Committee and several homeless registrants living along the railroad tracks in Miami-Dade County. The Brief, which can be read by clicking this link is excellent. The substance of the argument is that the application of Miami-Dade’s 2500 foot residency restrictions in Miami-Dade is particulary punitive and therefore constitutes