FAC addresses suspicious survey and invites “investigator” to answer concerns
This week, a suspicious invitation to participate in a “survey” was sent to every registered email on the Florida Sex Offender registry.
Today, we sent the following letter to the academic who is allegedly behind this survey, inviting him to answer to some glaring concerns we all have. We will update this post if he responds.
Letter To Southwestern College 11192020
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This former FDLE employee’s survey may not be illegal; yet the way he used our emails from FDLE’s database to send out his survey; seems highly unethical and unprofessional. Smells like a sting especially when a lawsuit is occurring. The timing seems way off unless it’s used to scare registrants from filing lawsuits against FDLE and the state of Florida. It’s time for their corrupt pedestal to get knocked down on their fantasyland.
I’m surprised he didn’t pose as an underage professor looking to understand the registry.
Assuming that he is no longer affiliated with FDLE, is it even legal for him to be using the email list?
Speaking of “investigators”
https://www.endchildhoodexploitation.org/
New vigilante group in JAX
https://www.firstcoastnews.com/article/news/local/predator-hunters-a-local-moms-extreme-measures-to-expose-child-predators/77-abb6034f-440e-4e37-abba-897af5347ddb
https://www.youtube.com/c/417PredatorHunters/about
https://www.facebook.com/ACEalliance417ph/
Looks like a match:
https://endsexualexploitation.org/people/dani-pinter/
Well I was curious and decided to check out those links. The Facebook one is horrendous, the amount of hate from people isn’t surprising. They are using it to specifically target and harrass the people and the peoples family and jobs. One person targeted has all the members on that page calling dcf to take his child away and making false claims so they will open tickets. Im not condoning people doing illegal actions with minors, but as a society we should handle things better. Even the police say that they can’t use the evidence the jax provided because its tainted but yet they are allowed to promote harrassment on these people. Sounds like more of the government made up crimes/entrapment for the false premise of child safety.
So, I’m sure if you ask a cop, or pretty much ANY individual, what they would do if someone threatened the safety and well- being of their family, they would answer with some pretty extreme measures likely including bodily harm or more of the person or persons targeting them or their family. YET, we are just expected to sit back and “take it”because we are on the registry. Any measures that would be understandable to protect one’s family, would be viewed in an entirely different light if undertaken by a person on the registry.
Keep harming a dog and expect it not to protect itself. When it does bite back, have it put down. These people who harass registrants are cowards who need a dog to kick. They look for people who cannot fight back.
I am in the middle of a situation where I am ensuring this treatment right now. As group moms have decided they didn’t want me around (my daughter was participating in a sport). The registry (aka “hit list”) was used to incite other parents to slander and libel me. Fortunately, there is also a significant portion of the parents and other evidence that the allegation are false. Unfortunately, I still have to weather this attack at a trial. I am sure the state is going to try and sway a jury based on my conviction and try to get them to convict me just because it’s the “right thing” to get me off the street, even though the evidence clearly proves my innocence. I was arrested in February and have only briefly spoken with my public defender. I am saving as best I can for a “real” attorney.
Once I have cleared this hurdle of exoneration, my goal is lots of lawsuits based on provable false sworn statements. Unfortunately, I don’t make a good “victim”because of my status as a registrant. It’s a way of basically saying, even though I was wronged, I either don’t deserve justice in this issue or that the perpetrators were justified. So, the lawsuits will likely be from my wife and daughter seeking damages for how they were wronged. The wrongs against me will likely go unpunished from my perspective.
Point is, we are basically “muzzled” and the public is generally okay with that.
Happy to see so many responses since this Professor decided to steal my business email addresses and within the survey ask if I’m compliant and if not, a bunch of personal questions about my case?
He would get better journalist results if he was to interview 10 Florida based RSOs and get permission / releases from each to tell their stories.
If he has our emails he has our names and he could use the information against us somehow.
This is shady ambush journalism at its worst!
JEV – True Confessions
So he changed his linked in profile?
Ironically, he is a professor but FAC just taught him a lesson.
Or maybe he abandoned his LinkedIn profile and just recently updated it when he became aware that the info was out of date? I saw his profile before the change and he did have the professor job listed, it was just that the professor job was not highlighted.
Not a tremendous revelation, however, DOC is not likely their current employment, as with all the other people on the list, the list includes their name and where they reside. So more than likely DOC is where they currently live, not work.