Vigilante uses signs to get neighbor to move.
An Ohio resident is unhappy that his neighbor is a registrant, so he has posted a banner on his property and pointing to the neighbor’s house, asking travelers down the street to honk and telling his neighbor to move.
This type of vigilantism is not just a nuisance, but it invites the public to harass the registrant by honking at all hours. Eventually someone will do something more nefarious.
Vigilantism is getting more creative every day and they say this is not punishment!
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Also, it seems this issue arose from a dispute over money; it seems that these made a verbal agreement for work on the property, so these two knew each other, so this vigilante is just a disgruntled neighbor.
The road we walk is not easy, and we are all trying to survive as best we can. I see a parallel to the experience of Black Americans in the 1940s, when uninformed and prejudiced people took actions to exclude, humiliate, and control men and women. In our case, it is not because we are any lesser human beings, but because we have taken a misstep in life—and people believe the lies spread by fear and misunderstanding.
In my opinion, while some organizations fight in court, one case at a time, I think it is more effective to also work nationally and locally to educate others and expose the injustice. These draconian restrictions, though sometimes done by well-intentioned people, are neither Christian nor American. Through ordinances, legislation, and policies, states are imposing rules that deny former sex offenders their dignity, equality, and personhood—giving government-sanctioned legitimacy to discrimination.
The law itself has become a tool of oppression, stripping men—brothers, fathers, grandfathers, and veterans—of equal protection and access. Floridians are fed a prejudicial template of falsehoods that, in their minds, justify unjust behavior. This dehumanization reduces former offenders to an inaccurate profile, denying their individuality, achievements, and dreams. They must navigate a minefield of rules about where they can live, travel, and work—under constant threat of punishment. This draconian mismanagement robs people of their lives, and by itself, should be unconstitutional and a violation of each representatives’ oath of office to serve and protect.
A wise friend once advised that under such circumstances we should stand our ground in truth—but do so kindly. Be open with neighbors, assuring them we are not a threat to their safety or family, and do it as openly and cordially as possible. My friend went to each nearby neighbor, the one next door with small kids, met them and briefly shared his circumstances. Look for ways to reject their wrongful behavior with kindness—greet them as you pass their house. Maintain that cordiality in the face of bad behavior, or, if necessary, shake the dust from your feet and move on with your life. By ignoring the affront, it may be your neighbor who ends up suffering more than you.
If the neighbor refuses to remove the sign, bring the grievance to your neighborhood association or city manager, asking for help to have it removed. To this group, you have already lost your anonymity. And if the sign clearly identifies your home, I like the idea of posting a matching sign of your own—commercially made in the same style—reading: “Honk if you love your neighbor – Mark 12:31,” with an arrow pointing toward your offending neighbor’s house. Now, whoever honks, it won’t be clear what that means, which takes the sting out of the noise. And you are effectively shaming your neighbor. At this point, you can’t hide your status—so own it and fight back. Sorry—easy to say, hard to do.
If I were that registrant and my property got vandalized, I’d be suing him. Pretty sure he’d have a hard time dodging liability.
Dustin
Although I do not agree with it, it would probably be covered under free speech. Maybe stretch it out to hate speech but sometimes we get physically attacked or our house damaged and the cops just say, “Try and get along with your neighbors”.
Taking the fine print into account, he is harassing his neighbor from his own yard against the fine print of the registry website in using data that is not meant to be used in such a manner and asking drivers to create a noise issue where there is none needed. I’d say it could be legally challenged and won by the neighbor who is being harassed.
@TS
I agree with you on legal and ethical terms, but you I would wager the PFR would still lose in court. Does he deserve to win? Absolutely, should he ethically? Of course, “live and let live”. Will he? Not a chance, here’s why:
Judges and Sheriffs generally need to campaign for office or are selected by a municipal/city council. If your style of law enforcement or court rulings go against the general court of public opinion, you’re going to find yourself out of a job next time you campaign.
Not sure who said it, but it rings true to me. “You can’t vote your way out of a broken system.”