Good News: Judge Denies Seminole's Motion to Dismiss

In a 24 page order that was issued Friday, the Judge in our Seminole County proximity ordinance challenge DENIED Seminole County and their Sheriff’s Motion to Dismiss our lawsuit!

The lawsuit, in which Florida Action Committee is plaintiff, was brought by the Florida Institutional Legal Services Project of Florida Legal Services on behalf of our organization and the registered citizens in the State of Florida who are subject to the proximity ordinance in Seminole County.

If you are interested in reading the Judge’s Order, you can find it here.

This, by no means, is the end of the fight – it just means that the Judge has ruled that our lawsuit has merit to proceed forward. We are very encouraged by the order, very grateful to our attorneys; Peter Sleasman and Cassandra Capobianco, and appreciative of the Court for having the integrity to allow us our opportunity to be heard!

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

10 thoughts on “Good News: Judge Denies Seminole's Motion to Dismiss

  • March 27, 2018

    Whatever happened with this? It’s been almost two years?

    Reply
    • March 27, 2018

      It died – our plaintiffs backed out because they would have to be named.

      Reply
      • March 28, 2018

        So therein lies the rub or so it would seem…

        The government has basically forced those of us intelligent enough into hiding for fear of reprisal for standing up against them despite having legal ground to stand on….

        That being said with the myriad of challenges that are presently in the works I would hate for them to fall flat.

        Is it not a viable option to have the plaintiffs named Does as in recent Supreme court rulings in other states or does that fall on its face in this states legal system?

        The day is fast approaching when I will be a part of this team….
        Anon for now.

        Reply
    • March 28, 2018

      I meant the Ordinance that was being challenged….did that get overturned. I know the motion to dismiss was denied…?

      Reply
      • March 28, 2018

        no. The case was abaondoned because our plaintiffs dropped out

        Reply
  • July 6, 2016

    Fantastic! Thank you for posting the Judge’s order. I read every word. Rooting for ya’ll (us) out here from Albuquerque!

    Reply
  • June 21, 2016

    i loved reading this part: ” By imposing arrest and criminal prosecution for a violation, the Court can reasonably infer that Seminole County intended the Ordinance to be criminal in nature, rather than civil or regulatory.”

    Reply
  • June 20, 2016

    Best news I’ve read all day. Grats y’all!

    Reply
  • June 20, 2016

    Thank you – small wins make big victories!

    Reply
  • June 20, 2016

    YESSS!!!!!!!!!!! GREAT NEWS

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *