Maine: Bill would prohibit registrants from living in apartments and condos

A legislative proposal in the Maine State House would add living restrictions to that state’s sex offender law.

The bill would ban a convicted sex offender from living in a multiunit building that shares an entrance with a unit occupied by a minor.

SOURCE

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

8 thoughts on “Maine: Bill would prohibit registrants from living in apartments and condos

  • February 26, 2019

    The problem is our brothers and sisters are fighting back hard enough or just don’t care !

    Reply
  • February 26, 2019

    This is a de facto law anyway. Go apply for an apartment and let me know what percentage get approved after the background check? And if you apply in a wife’s name and move in later, you get non-renewed.

    Reply
  • February 26, 2019

    Damn, who came up with that one??

    Reply
  • February 26, 2019

    This shows how ridiculous things are getting. Pretty soon we’ll all be living in a cow pasture somewhere.

    Reply
  • February 26, 2019

    How about this ordinance in Mequon, WI: “Child safety zones. No person shall enter or be present upon any real property upon which there exists any facility used for or which supports a use of: A movie theatre; A public or private golf course or range;” and a dozen more of such restrictions of which many like “golf courses, and movie theaters” that have nothing to do with being specific to children. In fact, I would venture to say that a private golf course is extremely unlikely to have any children! What about if the theater is featuring an “R” rated movie? Residency restrictions do not allow RSO to live near the police station or within 2000 feet of where someone is home schooled. Basically, after creating the map, the city attorney placed a restriction on any available spot on the map. Here is the map: https://www.ci.mequon.wi.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/police/page/2581/sex_offender_residency_restrictions.pdf Check out buffers around “municipal facility” and “home schools” along with “dance studio”, and “golf course”.
    Here is an article about the success in overcoming this abuse of power in Pleasant Prairie, WI over less restrictive rules: https://fox6now.com/2017/04/18/sex-offenders-win-federal-lawsuit-against-village-of-pleasant-prairie-its-going-to-open-a-lot-of-doors/

    Reply
    • February 26, 2019

      Note this ordinance “protects” children of all ages! Note the 2000 foot residency restriction around Milwaukee Area Technical College!

      Reply
    • February 26, 2019

      This gives the drug dealers ‘free range’ with the children. The drug dealers couldn’t have come up with such a good deal for themselves if they had tried. Some of these lawmakers are watching too much TV and playing too many video games.

      Reply
  • February 26, 2019

    More political actions by politicians running scared on false info. I suppose it’s OK for drug dealers to live there, after all, it makes buying drugs much easier for the parents. Sound crazy? Well that is what all these restrictions are.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *