Should Colorado still use the term “sex offender”? A state board is considering new language.

Seeking to move away from labels that can work against a person’s rehabilitation, Colorado’s Sex Offender Management Board plans to vote Friday to replace the term “sex offender” in its own guiding principles.

The board is considering several new terms, including clients, adults or individuals “who commit sexual offenses,” “who engage in sexually abusive behavior,” who are “in treatment for engaging in sexually abusive behaviors” or “who have committed sexual offenses.”

The board, which governs the standards for treatment of people convicted of sex offenses, is far from united on the issue of “person-first language” in this context. Members split 8-7 in the spring on a vote to adopt new guiding principles concerning language. Friday’s expected vote would finish off that process.

“I think the biggest thing is research really shows us that assigning a label has the potential for negative effects in rehabilitation,” said Kimberly Kline, a licensed counselor and chair of the board.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

32 thoughts on “Should Colorado still use the term “sex offender”? A state board is considering new language.

  • November 19, 2021

    The Colorado SOMB decided today to replace the term “sex offender” with the phrase “adult who commits sex offenses.” This is like replacing a certain derogatory term with “The N Word.” We still know what you mean. This is insufficient, and it is present tense language that implies everyone is actively offending. But there is a 20 day window to submit better suggestions. Go here and click on the “submit public comment” link:

    https://dcj.colorado.gov/boards-commissions/sex-offender-management-board

    Reply
    • November 19, 2021

      We STRONGLY encourage all of you to submit your comments.
      PLEASE!

      Reply
    • November 20, 2021

      Wow. I thought they were trying to improve something. That phrase is actually worse and even more inaccurate. That level of incompetency is pretty funny actually.

      I caught my listing on the Oppression Lists (OLs) over 2 decades ago. Today, I’m not anything related to “sex offender” or whatever nonsense terms they want to use. I’m just a PFR.

      The great thing is that because of the OLs, I don’t have any remorse about what I did. I won’t even acknowledge it any longer. Couldn’t care less about it or what people think. I thank the OLs for giving me that peace.

      They can keep calling me names if they want. They might as well because I’m not going to stop calling them names or making them pay consequences for the mere existence of the OLs. Amerika is a hateful place.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *