Florida Appellate Court Reverses Probation Violations for Non-Willful Violations
Last week a decision came out of Florida’s First District Court of Appeals that should provide some peace of mind to those unable to afford the cost of treatment and supervision.
The appellant was convicted of violating his probation for (1) failure to comply with his electronic monitoring, (2) failure to comply with sex offender treatment, and (3) failure to pay cost of supervision fees.
The appellant walked away from his ankle monitor base station for approximately five minutes while it was charging. The appellant could not cover the $90 cost for his sex offender treatment session and the therapist would not allow for partial payment. And the appellant could not afford the $4.50 daily cost of supervision because despite looking for employment, could not get a job.
The court found: Evidence that a probationer walked away from a monitoring device for a brief period of time is not competent, substantial evidence of a substantial and willful violation. In probation revocation proceedings for failure to pay a monetary obligation as a condition of probation, the trial court must find that the defendant’s failure to pay was willful—i.e., the defendant has, or has had, the ability to pay the obligation and purposefully did not do so.’ The failure to attend sex offender treatment is not willful if the probationer failed to attend due to a lack of ability to pay.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I am facing a situation where I did 10 years in prison followed by 10 years probation with monitoring. I was released in 2016 and am expecting to be done with probation on March 21,2016. I do construction work but my pay barely pays my bills so my payments have been sporadic. Yesterday my P.O. told me that I have 6 months to pay them $25,000 or she will issue a warrant for my arrest. I said that I still have until next year before my probation is completed. She stated to me that if she waits longer than the 6 months then it would be out of the courts hands. Can she really do this?